The AT91B is an excellent entry-level moving magnet cartridge. Aluminium cantilever Para-toroidal coils improve generating efficiency Centre shield plate between the left and right channels reduces crosstalk Durable low resonance polymer housingAudio-Technica AT91B. This reduces tracing distortion and allows for more accurate sound reproduction. Standard elliptical stylus model equipped with an elliptical bonded stylus.The original V was not quite up to the sound of certain moving coils. What I missed was fine detailespecially in the high frequencies and during heavily modulated passages. I was slightly disappointed with the original V15-V: I just didn't think it was a significant improvement over the Type IV. Stylus: Conical diamond.I was all set to give up on moving magnets until the new Shure VI5-VMR (MR stands for Micro-Ridge stylus) arrived. The AT91B has a conical stylus, which somewhat limits trackability and playback resolution.It has many virtues and no vices. OUR CARTRIDGE NEEDLE 1-LT 213 1/LT 213 1/LT It's as an all-round performer that the Shure VI5 Type V-MR excels. AUDIO TECHNICA CARTRIDGE TO OUR NEEDLE CROSS REFERENCE CHART BELOW.Gordon Holt will probably delete that last sentence breathing all that thin mountain air makes them favor high-end turntables, but I know JGH has a soft spot in his heart for the Shure. I question whether you can do significantly better at any price (Larry Archibald or J. Hallelujah! Here's more good news: the Type VMR is the best-sounding cartridge I have tried with the new AR turntable and tonearm.From the Audio Cheapskate's perspective, this is the combination to beat.
As it is, he is looking at $500 cartridges! Then he's going to have his Linn Sondek readjusted, and he's deciding whether to do the job himself or hire a Linn Guru (but which Linn Guru?there are two in our neck of the woods and each claims the other is following a false god)!I love it. He'd now have a $125 stylus to buy. It will cost you about half what you paid for the cartridge originally and you can always keep the original stylus as a spare.Now just think how much better off my friend, who owns The Ninth-Best Moving Coil in the World, would be if he had bought a Type V like I did. Run right out and buy an MR replacement stylus and upgrade immediately. If you already own an original V, don't hesitate. The difference in list prices is $55, but remember, no one pays list for a Shure. Clean my macbook freeAs it stands, no one seems to know what to do to balance high-fidelity against record library health.On one hand, we have the above assertions based on hearsay and anecdotal conjecture. Are the above reports accurate, and, if so, could JA reveal what he believe caused the record damage and what he changed in his LP playback system to ameliorate or reduce the wear?I ask because there seems to be no end of debate out there as to mechanistically how records actually wear, to what extent, and in response to all the playback variables (surface cleanliness, tracking force, stylus profile, compliance, resonance frequency of cartridge/arm, stylus jitter, etc). Not from neglect, but from cartridge gouging: low-compliance moving-coils that just scraped their way through the vinyl."What I'm curious to hear is the actual truth from the horse's mouth, as it were, regarding JA's anecdotal experience with record wear over the years. Oddly, all these comments issued from people other than JA.For instance, there was a statement made to this effect by someone in a forum awhile back ():"I remember John Atkinson of Stereophile saying how he ruined many LP's in his early audiophile years by using an "audiophile approved" moving coil cartridge that required a fairly heavy tracking force of at least 3 grams to keep from mistracking high frequencies that eventually wiped the highs off his LP's."And now the ST comment reprinted above from his 1989 revisit of the Shure type V-15 VMR cartridge, which recounts the condition of the LP's he heard on JA's system during his Santa Fe visit:"They were all worn—every one. One of Sam's virtues is his appetite for Crow. Larry ArchibaldThank you for posting this review of what is now a legendary phono pickup.But, egads, this is the second or third reference I've caught over the years regarding JA's record library having been irreversibly damaged by use of heavy-tracking, low-compliance cartridges. Maybe Sam is just daring me to send him that better combination. But I do think that Sam Tellig was, as we would say in England, "taking the Michael." I am slowly transferring my LP collection to 24/192 digital files and I have yet to come across a damaged disc.My experience echoes Michael Fremer's, in that tracking at too low a downforce damages groove walls, especially with highly profiled styli. I don't remember writing that I used a high-end MC cartridge tracking at 3 grams that ruined my records, but I will look in my archives. Oddly, all these comments issued from people other than JA.It is odd. It would help clear the air of confusion, and maybe even motivate us to clean our record grooves more thoroughly!S10sondek wrote: But, egads, this is the second or third reference I've caught over the years regarding JA's record library having been irreversibly damaged by use of heavy-tracking, low-compliance cartridges. Jay z vol 3 mp3The good thing is different styli ride at different heights up the groove walls so, if the record is damaged, changing to another cartridge may well resolve the problem with such a disc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorElizabeth ArchivesCategories |